Matrix and Baudrillard Questions
Posted by on Thursday, April 2nd, 2015 at 10:25 am-
Explain, in your own words, Baudrillard’s concept of the simulation and the simulacrum. Give an example (and feel free to take one of the examples from the book).
-
What is the real? What is the hyperreal? What does it mean to no longer have referents?
-
Based on this week’s reading, how do you understand the distinction between real and digital in The Matrix? What role does the gaze or the eyes play in this negotiation?
-
In his stages of the real (see handout for clarification), is Baudrillard saying that we had access to the real during an earlier historical moment?
-
What about capitalism (and the industrial revolution before) caused us to lose access to the real?
-
Baudrillard says that the real no longer exists. Do we agree? What are the implications for philosophy, for art, for technology if Baudrillard is right?
-
The Matrix goes so far as to name the area where liberated humans are introduced to the idea of the matrix as the “desert of the real.
-
How does the film interpret Baudrillard? Is the Matrix a simulation? Does that mean Zion (and the machine world) are the real?
-
What does it mean that “naturally” born characters, like Tank, do not have access to the simulation? Are they more human? Is this possible?
-
References to religion are numerous in The Matrix. How does the Matrix complicate the concepts of (pro)creation, origin, and finally femininity?
-
Are the humans in the Matrix actually machines? Where is this line drawn in the movie? What characters transgress these boundaries and what does this mean?
-
What, ultimately, are the humans defending?
-
How does the movie reinterpret and play with the system of the sign (referent, signifier, signified) previously discussed in Baudrillard’s Simulacra and Simulation?
-
How does the Matrix utilize the affordances of the digital environment, as outlined by Murray?
-
What about the separation between mind and body? How does it affect the notion of the self?
-
In the world of the Matrix, only the “mind” can enter the simulation, even though choices made in the simulation can affect the body in the real. Is the film endorsing a mind/ body dualism or is it rejecting such philosophy? Or is the discussion more nuanced?
-
Would Baudrillard take the red pill or the blue pill?
-
Who was Neo speaking to at the end of the film?
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 You can leave a response, or trackback.