What is behavioral science?

The following program is produced by the University of Michigan broadcasting service under a grant he

made from the National Educational Television and Radio Center in cooperation with the

National Association of educational broadcasters and infant

science a program from the series human behavior social and

medical research produced by the University of Michigan broadcasting service

with special assistance from the Mental Health Research Institute at the University of Michigan.

These programs have been developed from interviews with men and women who have the too

often unglamorous job of basic research. Research in medicine the

physical sciences social sciences and the behavioral sciences.

Occasionally you will hear what may seem like strange or unfamiliar sounds.

These are the sounds of the participants office his laboratory or clinic where the

interviews were first conducted. Today we will meet the participants as

they speak. My name is Glenn Phillips. A new

science has appeared and infant science. It applies the

scientific method that is examination measuring and testing to man himself.

It is the behavioral sciences as medicine for example draws from many

sciences knowledge pertaining to the health of man. So then does

behavioral science draw from many disciplines the knowledge that each can contribute to the

problems of understanding the behavior of man. What are the aims of the

behavioral science. For that answer and for more specific answers to what the

science is we go to the scientists themselves. First in answer to the

question Do you have a theory of Behavioral Science Professor Harry

Helsa of the University of California said.

I wouldn't say that there is any single general theory of behavioral

science. There have been general

theories of behavior. Almost everybody

now is familiar with the psychoanalytic

approach. We've had behaviorism which has been

a general approach to problems of behavior. And so

on. The tendency now is to develop specific

theories for specific areas or specific problems.

And there I think we are going pretty much the way of the natural

sciences. In general

psychology today is almost universally regarded

as the science of behavior. And behavior is

a sufficiently broad term to encompass. The.

Actions and performances of not only humans at all

age levels but also of sub human and even sub

mammalian species.

Probably the all most

general type of theory today in behavioral

sciences is learning theory so-called

sense behavioral scientists have to deal

with the products all the learning since the way most of us act is

a product of the culture the family the particular experiences

to which we have been exposed. Learning theory tends to be about

as close a general theory of behavioral science as anything we have.

At least learning theory or certain types of learning theory have been taken

over by other people in the social sciences for

example by anthropologists by psychiatrists

and others.

And this was the belief of a practicing psychiatrist Dr Philip Hugh Roche in

Philadelphia.

Well as a representative of a

medical discipline or better a medical psychological

discipline I can only relate to you do that

through the. Our own

theory of behavior we attempt to explain it

within within that theory and that this would be

identified as a psychiatric or psychoanalytic theory

that we attempt to understand the motivations

of behavior. We do not attempt to explain why

people commit acts that are antisocial

or why people behave in any manner as a matter of fact. But we feel that we

have sufficient theoretical constructions supported by

sufficient clinical observation. Of behavior

to allow us to attempt at least to

explain people how people come

about to do as they do so that the answer to your

question will be yes that we have a special

body of theory that we feel enables us to

not only to to

analyze behavior but in some measure to predict it

from the University of Utah and an anthropologist view we heard from Professor

Robert Anderson.

Some investigators have felt the need for and an all

embracing over embracing theory to cover the science of

psychology sociology anthropology breast physiology.

The University of Michigan has been the leader in this in this movement from my own

point of view. I don't find the need at

present of establishing a new super science. I think we ought to develop as

far as we can with theoretical positions of our separate sciences. If

I have strong feelings about this matter lies in this that there ought to be

recognized an area called cultural science as opposed to an area

called biological or sociological or psychological science. We often thought

up our own Bally licks and then look for the relations between them rather than to

establish a holding company the signs with a new theory.

It seems clear that behavioral science is a multidisciplinary effort to study the actions of

man and their relation one to another and their environment. I asked Dr.

Ralph Tyler who is director of the Center for Advanced Study in the behavioral sciences

in Palo Alto California.

If I was correct in my belief that this was indeed a multidisciplinary approach

you Commander talk about behavioral science as though it were one field of study and it

is run in the sense that it is an effort to understand how and

why human beings behave as they do. Or you may think of it as a

collection of Sciences ranging from the biological the neurological for

example trying to understand the brain and how it operates.

So show concern with an understanding of the psychology of motivation

why people learn and how they learn and what happens to the

individual in this connection. Social in the sense of understanding more of the effect of

groups upon human behavior we've talked a good deal for example these days about the

danger of too much conformity. The organization man was a

volume that brought to our attention the danger that individuals would

lose their individual creativity and originality by being

submerged in the total organization. Now all this range.

From the biological through the social and including

mathematics as a tool to help understand and to bring order out of the data.

All this range can be thought of as a collection of Sciences which

together can bring more understanding of human behavior here at the center we try each

year to bring in people from this total range. They have some

things in common they are concerned with some common problems for example

almost every year there has been a group of six to 10 people

whose primary concerns were about mental health. Understanding

more about the social factors in mental health as well as the biological

What what is there about the brain that may result in mental illness. What is there about

the individual's own strivings and his own psychology that may affect

his health. What is there about the society in which he lives the family

the groups to which he belongs that may bring greater tensions and make it difficult for

him to maintain stability and to be healthy in that sense. We have also

quite often had groups that were primarily concerned with the

study of language behavior. How do

we get a language what is the problem of communicating from one group of

people to another over the boundaries of different languages. What are the rays in

which the nature of the language of a people determines how they think in the

sort of conclusions they can reach. Because since we do think with language the structure

of that language makes a good deal of difference in determining the limits of the kind of

thinking we can do. Typically two we have had people that have been concerned with

the the more basic problems of

our ecology that is higher as a human being.

React in different kinds of environments to a fact. Does one kind of

environment have in contrast to another. What are the conditions required for a person

to be able to use his environment effectively rather than to be controlled by it

so that he becomes just a pawn rather than a real human being who can do things on

his own. We've often had persons that are

here together as groups interested in the problems of the

economic development of underdeveloped areas because economic development is

not just getting knowledge about production and distribution it is not just getting

economics. It also affects the kinds of beliefs people have

the sort of practices they follow at home and in their social

institutions the kind of education they carry on understanding all of

this in relation to how a nation may move ahead to increase its

productivity and to become able to afford the kind of standards of living that

make for health and well-being. These are other illustrations so that I believe we

would say that there is as time goes on an

increasing understanding of these various facets and we are getting in that

sense a greater unified science of human behavior. But at the

present time we have a group of Sciences each approaching the problems from

its own points of view and each giving only part of the knowledge that we need

with the many disciplines playing such a large role in this study.

What will be demanded of the scientists of the future. Will specialisation continue or

will a greater degree of proficiency in several areas be required.

Dr. Max Milliken of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology stated yes this

is a very very difficult problem. The question

confronting a man who wants to be a behavioral scientist shall he specialize

as shall he. In one of the traditional disciplines shall he attempt to learn a little

bit about all of the disciplines.

There are terrible dangers in both directions. If he's really trying to

understand human behavior human behavior is inherently complex. It's partly

psychological It's partly sociological it's partly political it's partly economic and

if you're trying to understand a society or even a small

institution or even an individual he really ought to know something about all of

these disciplines to get a full understanding. On the other hand these

disciplines are themselves. Each of them complex involve a detailed

detailed modes of analysis of their own. And he's in serious danger if you get sort of a

smatter of each of them and not understanding any of them.

So there is this awful dilemma that faces all of us I'm faced with it myself personally because

the area which I'm mainly concerned with is trying to understand what's going on in the

underdeveloped countries. This requires

an understanding of the psychology of the transition from traditional society to

modernity it requires an understanding of the political process of the social process

of a great deal of the psychological strains that these things involve as well as an

understanding of the things that I learned in my own professional training about the economics of economic

development. On the other hand if you try to cover all of these

fields you neither understand economics nor the psychology of any of the other things

so that what I think is called for really is a kind of compromise.

I think it's going to continue to be necessary for each professional who wants to

become a behavioral scientist to pick a discipline which will be his prime

specialty and to develop thorough and complete competence in that

discipline.

I think you must then be exposed to enough of the other social science

disciplines so that at least who knows what they're about and knows what he

doesn't know about them. And then I think we've got to move into a period when

research in the social sciences will be very much more largely group

research and much less individual research than in the past

research in which you get a series of people each of whom not only knows one

discipline thoroughly but understands enough of its connections with the

other disciplines so that he can communicate with the specialists in other fields and work

jointly with them on the same subject Dr Raymond

Bauer of Harvard said.

That's already happened. I got my Ph.D. 10 years ago. Even if I

remembered all of the math I had. Statistics that I had at the

time I would still be hopelessly outdated. If I wanted to be up to date

today I have to take a year off to study mathematics.

Are we perhaps entering an era that we could call one of the scientific liberal arts

education. But I think we are.

It's interesting that the even within science and engineering there's a

recognition that knowledge is changing so fast that the

person trained only as a neuro specialist is likely to find himself obsolete

halfway through his career. We are finding this and the Russians are finding

this here at MIT for example. We are in the process of a radical revision of our

curriculum which is exactly the opposite direction from specialization. When a

man came here to study electrical engineering 10 15 years ago

he had to choose as a freshman or a sophomore one of five or six or

seven options in which he would concentrate intellectual electrical engineering he'd be a power man or

he'd be an Electron tube man or he'd be a circuit man or something of this kind.

Now our whole electrical engineering curriculum has been completely revised. Everybody takes the same

thing and they take mostly fundamental physics Fundamental mathematics.

And enough of the sort of basic understanding of the

sciences so that as engineers they can specialize later

but when their particular specialization begins to be obsolete because of new

scientific developments they won't be lost now exactly the same thing I think is going to apply

to the social sciences I think.

One of the things it means is inevitably that the period of

education is going to have to be extended still more. I think people will have to begin

their narrow specialization at a later stage

even than they have in the past because their background knowledge of fundamentals

and rather across the board has got to be very much more profound.

In Redwood City California at the end Pax corporation Dr. Alex babblings

had this to say.

I think that. In the social sciences more and

more of the problems that are. Interesting and exciting tend to

lie between are not wholly within one IQ Demick disciplined

traditional discipline. And I think already there have been some

some changes in universities. One can find now

men who are majoring in psychology who have a

background of engineering and this is considered quite helpful. The role of

mathematics and psychological theorizing has grown considerably

and more graduate students are getting a much better background in mathematics I think this is

this is inevitable. Actually that question would be yes.

This is not to say that we can pin our hopes entirely on

interdisciplinary research. Most

of which takes place in groups. Composed of individuals who have had their

basic training in a given discipline and such groups. The problem of communication become

rather difficult. I think you're right in suggesting that in the long run

a broader education. For. The researcher is going to be

necessary.

And once again on the same subject Professor Bower spoke.

I think we're caught in the same bind that everybody's caught and there's some pay off for being

broader and there's some payoff for being there or I suspect that the.

Period of training will increase. This just seems to be creeping up all over the

place.

And that there will be some attempt to make people both more intensive and more extreme.

But. I don't think it's possible let's say that.

The payoff will be in either one direction or the other. Are you going to have some people who are going to have spread out

and some are going to have to.

Continue to be know and work very intensively. Now I think that the

developments of Michigan. And General Systems Theory are an example of

really spreading out. That is to work and.

To work on the line that is being done at Michigan by Dr Miller and his associates.

Why you have to.

Be part biologist sociologist physiologist psychologist.

What they're doing is. Studying the characteristics of simple systems.

On a whole variety of levels of organization and Professor

George Homans of Harvard University's sociology department. Made this

remark in the value of multidisciplinary study.

I can't see that it's done any great harm.

What do you think is going to do any great good.

One of the behavioral sciences perhaps the most advanced of the behavioral sciences is.

Economics. And it seems to me

clear that as a result of the. Developments in

economics over the last. 30 years or so there is a better

understanding of. How the economic system works and

what's necessary to keep it in in some kind of.

Equilibrium without. Too tremendous ups and downs. A

better knowledge of this and wave we had before. So I think if. If this is

something that we value and most of us do why economics has certainly been a good thing.

I think the I think the same thing is probably true of

psychology that where a lot more humane by my standards

in. Dealing with the mentally sick and we have been in the

past I don't know how many. Positive cures

the knowledge of modern psychology has brought about. But the

general way of understanding and treating people has by my standards

certainly improved and I think that modern psychology has from

Freud on has got a great deal to

pat itself on the back for Professor Homans also spoke of the way

by which one discipline might compliment another sociology

conceivably it would be of benefit to.

Psychology because after all. People are always working

as a living as individuals in social context and a better

understanding of the kinds of social pressures a person might have to adjust

to. Would clearly be or should be a

a benefit to the psychologist who is trying to

produce. Individuals with better mental health.

In the same way out. Of. A cycle of sociology.

Because it's my subject I speak of it conceivably could. And I think it has

man an advantage too. Two well

economics and teaching economics the. Variety

of different kinds of. Power for the behavior of

goods that. Economics.

Play deals with. One locale where much of the work is

being conducted a is the center for the Advanced Study in the behavioral sciences in Palo

Alto California. Dr. Ralph Tyler who is the director of the center

discuss their work and explained their aims in this way.

The Senate approved van study in the behavioral sciences was established six years

ago. Through a grant made by the Ford Foundation. The

purpose of the center is to provide a place where each year some 50

outstanding scholars and scientists studying human behavior

can come from their universities and other research centers to work

both individually and in groups upon important problems in

understanding human behavior better. The center provides a

place where during the year that man is here he

has no other responsibilities and study and research. He has no teaching or

administrative responsibilities. It also provides him a chance to be in contact

with other scholars and scientists from other parts of this country

and from abroad who are working on the same problems he is so that they can learn from

each other during the time they are here.

A point which is often been touched upon is whether the need for less on people between various

disciplines might be beneficial. And this was discussed by Dr. MILLIKEN.

Yes I think that's right I think they do have to be more people like that although again I

wouldn't carry the division of labor too far. I would say I'd rather put it a slightly

different way.

I think it would be better if the.

Oh I read most of the individuals in gauged in

scientific research social or natural were generalists for

a somewhat larger fraction of their time than has been the case traditionally in the past

and specialists for a somewhat smaller fraction. I think they stood still

exceedingly desirable for individuals to develop a specialty because only by

working through in detail the very hard business of trying

to be as precise as possible about a relatively narrow area. Can you get a clear picture of the

limits of knowledge in the areas that you don't clearly understand.

One other thing I'd like to say about this that I think is very important and that is

that we mustn't be rigid in defining what our specializations

are. One of the ways in which we get more interconnections between disciplines

is for people to develop new specialties which borrow a little from one another from another. Just as is

happening currently it's now perfectly respectable to be a bio physicist. A few years

ago this was much less respectable You were either a biologist or you were a physicist.

But now by knowing a little less physics and a little less biology but a great deal more about certain of the

areas where the two overlap you develop a specialization which is just as narrow in a way

as the parents from which it sprung but which fills in a Gap builds a bridge

between those two.

In response to a question Is science entering a dawn of a new era. Professor

Homans commented I don't know.

By the end of this year I should think it might be pretty dormant but I just think the

dorm was likely to be coming. I do not despair of that.

If as Professor Homans implies science is flirting with mysteries of man and then the

future should indeed be filled with many new and interesting discoveries.

What can they do for world peace.

We contemplate the president dies now or is asked for a science for

peace. The issues which can be attacked by behavioral science are the human

ones whose solution can guide world affairs along the course from Cold War to ultimate

peace. These are the most crucial of the many applied problems to which the sciences of

man address themselves. There's been almost no

systematic research in behavioral science concerning international relations and diplomacy

negotiation the prevention of war or the operation of arms control systems.

Yet the most striking diplomatic successes have been mixtures of technology in politic.

Such was our Open Skies proposal and our atoms for peace plan

human technologies can also be employed. Behavioral scientists could

make a specific contribution in their ads. The strength

of a nation depends on its technical immaterial asset and on the scientific research which

constantly expands these physical resources. But national strength is equally

dependent upon human factors which determine how effectively physical resources are

you. The hell the morale and the motivation of the population as

well as the formal and informal organization of the society the well-being and

happiness of its citizens are goals of a democratic society rather than mere means

for an attainment of greater material strength and the productivity of society is

dependent upon all these human factors which are the subject of study of

the behavioral sciences. Next week you will hear

research and the government's role. On the next program from the series.

Human behavior social and medical research consultant for this

program was Dr. James G Miller was director of the University of Michigan's Mental

Health Research Institute to whom we extend our special thing

plan Philip speaking asking that you join us next week and thanking you for being with us

at this time.

This program has been produced by the University of Michigan broadcasting service under a grant in

aid from the National Educational Television and Radio Center in cooperation with the National

Association of educational broadcasters. This is the NEA E.B. Radio

Network.