Literature (US) – Maryland Institute for Technology in the Humanities https://mith.umd.edu Fri, 14 Aug 2020 18:57:12 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.5.1 Dana Williams and Kenton Rambsy Digital Dialogue https://mith.umd.edu/dialogues/dd-fall-2016-dana-williams-kenton-rambsy/ Wed, 09 Nov 2016 14:30:32 +0000 http://mith.umd.edu/?post_type=mith_dialogue&p=17799 Patterns in literary scholarship suggest that serious considerations of a literary period do not fully begin until at least a generation after its emergence. Accordingly, meaningful scholarship on African American literature since 1970 is only now beginning to slowly emerge. Scholars interested in this period face two significant challenges. First, the sheer volume of [...]

The post Dana Williams and Kenton Rambsy Digital Dialogue appeared first on Maryland Institute for Technology in the Humanities.

]]>

Patterns in literary scholarship suggest that serious considerations of a literary period do not fully begin until at least a generation after its emergence. Accordingly, meaningful scholarship on African American literature since 1970 is only now beginning to slowly emerge. Scholars interested in this period face two significant challenges. First, the sheer volume of literature published after 1970 can be overwhelming, so identifying a specialty area around which to acquire deep expertise is at once critical and limiting. Second, since literary periods are themselves often nebulously constructed, developing literary histories for a contemporary period can quickly dissolve into competing contrivances, particularly if/when primary source material to document many of its ideals and common threads prove elusive.

Arguably, the clash of too much written material to claim mastery of and too little awareness of primary resources related to the desired specialty area has resulted in an unnecessary muting of key discourses that shaped this highly influential period. Digital Humanities practices, however, can help manage this challenge, thereby giving voice to these key discourses. Ultimately, Williams and Rambsy contend that data management (technology) can be an essential tool for constructing a substantive literary history with a texture reflective of the period’s ripe content and contexts. As a case in point, the presentation focuses specifically on those texts Toni Morrison brought into print as Senior Editor at Random House Publishing Company as the specialty area around which the presenters have significant expertise and for which a singularly unique literary history can be constructed.

See below for a Storify recap of this Digital Dialogue, including live tweets and select resources referenced by Williams and Rambsy during their talk.

The post Dana Williams and Kenton Rambsy Digital Dialogue appeared first on Maryland Institute for Technology in the Humanities.

]]>
Using Digital Tools to Not-Read Gertrude Stein’s “The Making of Americans” https://mith.umd.edu/dialogues/using-digital-tools-to-not-read-gertrude-steins/ Tue, 11 Sep 2007 04:00:08 +0000 http://mith.umd.edu/?post_type=mith_dialogue&p=4229 The difficulties engendered by the complicated patterns of repetition in Gertrude Stein's 900-page novel _The Making of Americans_ make it almost impossible to read this modernist tome in a traditional, linear manner as any page (most are startlingly similar) will show. However, by visualizing certain of its patterns--by looking at the text "from a distance"--through [...]

The post Using Digital Tools to Not-Read Gertrude Stein’s “The Making of Americans” appeared first on Maryland Institute for Technology in the Humanities.

]]>
The difficulties engendered by the complicated patterns of repetition in Gertrude Stein’s 900-page novel _The Making of Americans_ make it almost impossible to read this modernist tome in a traditional, linear manner as any page (most are startlingly similar) will show. However, by visualizing certain of its patterns–by looking at the text “from a distance”–through textual analytics and visualizations, one can read the novel in ways formerly impossible and re-evaluate whether there is or is not “a there there.” This talk will focus on how various analytic methods (such as text mining and frequent pattern recognition) and visualization tools (such as FeatureLens and Spotfire) under research in the MONK project have been used to achieve a new *non*-reading of the text which Stein called her “masterpiece” and critiques called “linguistic murder.”

The post Using Digital Tools to Not-Read Gertrude Stein’s “The Making of Americans” appeared first on Maryland Institute for Technology in the Humanities.

]]>