- Series
- Special of the week
- Air Date
- 1961-03-29
- Duration
- 00:29:56
- Episode Description
- This program presents Abraham Ribicoff speaking about school segregation and other issues at a press conference.
- Series Description
- Special of the Week #1. Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare Abraham Ribicoff at his first news conference, Feb. 1961.
- Subject(s)
- Creator(s)
- University of Michigan (Producer)
- Contributors
- Ribicoff, Abraham, 1910-1998 (Speaker)
- Genre(s)
- Geographic Region(s)
- regions
- Time Period
- 1961-1970
[00:05 - 00:10]
I think education is such a basic problem for the United States. I think that we must
[00:10 - 00:15]
improve the educational standards of boys and girls no matter where they may be no
[00:15 - 00:19]
matter what the color of their skin may be. I don't think an innocent
[00:19 - 00:23]
child in Mississippi our New Orleans our little rock
[00:23 - 00:29]
should suffer at all because of some philosophy that his
[00:29 - 00:33]
elders or a school board may have. Now if we are going to get on with
[00:33 - 00:38]
education let's get on with it. But the surest way that we will deprive this
[00:38 - 00:43]
country of the educational excellence that it has if we start putting
[00:43 - 00:48]
all the other problems that we face as a nation on the back of
[00:48 - 00:52]
education. And since I am interested in education and I am fighting for
[00:52 - 00:57]
a better education America. I want to fight against everything that I think will hold
[00:57 - 00:59]
back education.
[00:59 - 01:06]
The voice you have just heard is that of Abraham Ribicoff United States secretary of Health
[01:06 - 01:11]
Education and Welfare. The statement was made at the secretary's first press
[01:11 - 01:15]
conference held in Washington D.C. in February. The remainder of that press
[01:15 - 01:20]
conference in a moment. This program is one of a series arranged by the Washington office
[01:20 - 01:25]
of the National Association of educational broadcasters and recorded with the cooperation of the United
[01:25 - 01:32]
States Information Agency. Now the first question to Secretary ripped off.
[01:32 - 01:38]
Was a. Long. Long.
[01:38 - 01:43]
Long. Day.
[01:43 - 01:44]
If.
[01:44 - 01:51]
Your. All didn't.
[01:51 - 01:52]
Believe you
[01:52 - 02:04]
believe that powered house or.
[02:04 - 02:08]
Various or three ministries might be very
[02:08 - 02:14]
hard work are coming along for
[02:14 - 02:18]
a very huge part of
[02:18 - 02:24]
your If someone refuses.
[02:24 - 02:37]
Three year old well frankly I haven't seen them
[02:37 - 02:42]
all in my conversations with the heads of most
[02:42 - 02:47]
of the departments concerning what they were driving at and what their hopes and
[02:47 - 02:49]
aspirations were.
[02:49 - 02:54]
They seem to be consistent with policies that I would maintain but
[02:54 - 02:58]
to say whether I would have. A goal 10 years from now formulated by my
[02:58 - 03:03]
predecessor I wouldn't be quite so I think there are many things just a
[03:03 - 03:08]
field of education. The goal of President Kennedy is a different goal than the goal of
[03:08 - 03:13]
President Eisenhower. The goal in the field of health for the Aging is a
[03:13 - 03:15]
different goal than President Eisenhower.
[03:15 - 03:20]
So when you talk about goals a direction certainly of this administration are different directions
[03:20 - 03:24]
and the previous administration has
[03:24 - 03:26]
not.
[03:26 - 03:42]
Do we know
[03:42 - 03:45]
this in the States.
[03:45 - 03:50]
It is my hope and it is and the message on the bill indicates that this really
[03:50 - 03:55]
is a state's rights bill. Their federal government will
[03:55 - 03:59]
practice will have very very little control
[03:59 - 04:04]
whatsoever over any of the programs these programs
[04:04 - 04:10]
of special educational needs will be programs a screened in
[04:10 - 04:14]
approach by the state administration itself. It would be submitted of course
[04:14 - 04:19]
to the United States Commission of Education to see if it satisfies criteria
[04:19 - 04:24]
for an example it would be very obvious if they were building a rural school and
[04:24 - 04:29]
and they said they wanted to build a new road to go to that school. And at
[04:29 - 04:33]
this was a special need. Well I would doubt that under
[04:33 - 04:39]
our intent that you could use this money to build that road. So
[04:39 - 04:43]
basically there will be a very very a little
[04:43 - 04:48]
controller into Ferentz by the federal government in any of these programs.
[04:48 - 05:00]
These good files could be used and we would hope they would be
[05:00 - 05:05]
used to break some new ground to have some imagination to
[05:05 - 05:10]
bring new leadership in the entire field of education. Every
[05:10 - 05:15]
state has different problems. New York City might have a problem with
[05:15 - 05:20]
slum areas and the problems that it would have in relation to
[05:20 - 05:24]
children that come out of slum areas. Another area might have a special problem in
[05:24 - 05:30]
rural districts. Another problem in another
[05:30 - 05:35]
area might want to do something about the children of migrant workers.
[05:35 - 05:40]
Another area might decide that they want to do something for the mentally retarded child.
[05:40 - 05:45]
Another school district or an area might want to institute a
[05:45 - 05:50]
program of excellence for the children of superior intelligence to
[05:50 - 05:54]
combine let us say the last year the first year of a
[05:54 - 05:59]
college education in the last year of high school.
[05:59 - 06:03]
So it is very very broad to take care of any specific
[06:03 - 06:08]
educational need decided by the state.
[06:08 - 06:12]
In view of a very very broad criteria standard set up by the federal
[06:12 - 06:14]
government.
[06:14 - 06:18]
Yes but it will be
[06:18 - 06:22]
with your in every state.
[06:22 - 06:29]
Let me give you a we try to do that
[06:29 - 06:34]
yesterday at the briefing. Ralph land let me say this that so
[06:34 - 06:39]
we can understand one another. I don't know all the answers. I don't know how long it will take me
[06:39 - 06:44]
to ever know them all my hunches I never wail. I will not hesitate to tell you that I
[06:44 - 06:49]
don't know something of I don't know it however if you ask me a question out in a field that I don't
[06:49 - 06:53]
know. That doesn't mean you're not entitled to the answer will try to find it out for you as fast as we
[06:53 - 06:54]
can.
[06:54 - 06:59]
Now since it is complicated and Ralph Flint is much more knowledgeable than I am Ralph would you
[06:59 - 07:09]
please try to explain it to explain this.
[07:09 - 07:13]
Whole relationship for the men and
[07:13 - 07:24]
will. Never.
[07:24 - 07:28]
Leave their men to give
[07:28 - 07:36]
us a view that. I really only
[07:36 - 07:38]
remember the building.
[07:38 - 07:49]
Yes I am opposed to this amendment. My philosophy is this.
[07:49 - 07:53]
I believe in the decision of the Supreme Court. I believe that it has
[07:53 - 07:57]
a legal basis as well as a moral basis.
[07:57 - 08:01]
However my job is education. I believe deeply that we have to move forward in the
[08:01 - 08:06]
field of education and I can't imagine any greater tragedy for America than to try
[08:06 - 08:11]
to put on the backs of education and impede its progress by trying to solve every
[08:11 - 08:16]
problem that be sets our society over and through and under blocking
[08:16 - 08:22]
going ahead in the field of education. And it would be my hope that we could move ahead in the field of
[08:22 - 08:27]
education north south east and west for white and Negro alike. The
[08:27 - 08:32]
problems that come under civil rights are problems that we are going to have to face as a people
[08:32 - 08:37]
that this problem will have to be faced by the Congress by those in the executive branch and in the states
[08:37 - 08:42]
themselves. But it would be my hope that we would not be able to block education
[08:42 - 08:47]
with any other side issues no matter how important they are. I would
[08:47 - 08:51]
like to see the issue presented to the Congress of the American people. Are you are are you are
[08:51 - 08:56]
not for improvement in the field of education and do you or do you not believe that the
[08:56 - 09:01]
federal government should play a role and not try to bring up many of the side
[09:01 - 09:06]
issues from year to year which hides the real intent and the purposes of those who are for
[09:06 - 09:07]
or against a bill.
[09:07 - 09:12]
Yes I think that has helped
[09:12 - 09:15]
her to break the arc.
[09:15 - 09:20]
All right I know this is it and I don't know what answer the Defense
[09:20 - 09:25]
Department gave Starr so I can tell you that this happens to be my answer you can draw any
[09:25 - 09:30]
allusion that you want but I think it's a different problem entirely. You
[09:30 - 09:36]
write My position is the position of that of the present the
[09:36 - 09:41]
United States has set out his message today.
[09:41 - 09:51]
Yes it.
[09:51 - 09:58]
Will. Help with. Research.
[09:58 - 10:03]
It is it is good it is contemplated that there would be an institute
[10:03 - 10:08]
that would encompass eventually the entire spectrum
[10:08 - 10:13]
of human life from the child right through the adult to the
[10:13 - 10:14]
aging.
[10:14 - 10:27]
Well I would say that certainly if you can the companies that can cut if you can encompass
[10:27 - 10:32]
it in one there's no sense of setting up another a duplicate agency cost a lot of money we'd like
[10:32 - 10:34]
to save it if we can.
[10:34 - 10:39]
Yes it would. You know here are a few US are thinking of
[10:39 - 10:44]
me the individual who regards this
[10:44 - 10:50]
on the day you rejoice even a friend.
[10:50 - 10:52]
Hello. I let her know the deal.
[10:52 - 10:56]
I would say that certainly weighed out to contemplate that they can go to a hospital that
[10:56 - 11:02]
isn't an accredited hospital. I would say Here it is our intention to rely heavily
[11:02 - 11:07]
upon the states for accreditation and approval of proper hospital
[11:07 - 11:12]
facilities. But this we certainly would expect people to go to proper hospitals.
[11:12 - 11:17]
But in the but let's say that in a community you have two hospital or five hospitals a
[11:17 - 11:19]
patient could choose his own hospital.
[11:19 - 11:21]
If you have five accredited institutions.
[11:21 - 11:27]
Oh yes. Give me the bill.
[11:27 - 11:30]
You will be relieved. We'll bring
[11:30 - 11:34]
you some.
[11:34 - 11:38]
No I would say that there would be an arrangement between the federal government and the
[11:38 - 11:43]
hospital upon what the reasonable charges that hospitals have under these
[11:43 - 11:47]
circumstances. There are comparable arrangements
[11:47 - 11:52]
with the governments with Blue Cross with various
[11:52 - 11:58]
plans today and it works out fairly well I think that the
[11:58 - 12:03]
American Hospital Association understands this and the people in Social Security understand
[12:03 - 12:07]
this and I do not contemplate that this will be a basic problem.
[12:07 - 12:24]
Yes ma'am.
[12:24 - 12:29]
If you know that will be how many people over 65 could take care of their own
[12:29 - 12:32]
needs in the first point.
[12:32 - 12:37]
You never know for me to really come up with like the
[12:37 - 12:39]
right.
[12:39 - 12:44]
One for a. Younger guy he doesn't know there's
[12:44 - 12:48]
any way.
[12:48 - 12:52]
It's not. How much of an answer but I think that now the.
[12:52 - 13:05]
Vice President of an insurance company who is a good friend of mine who'd always been against
[13:05 - 13:10]
these programs and he used to argue very very vehemently
[13:10 - 13:14]
with me and his father in law was ill with cancer in the hospital
[13:14 - 13:19]
and the weeks got into months and the months went over a
[13:19 - 13:24]
year and the cost became so burdensome that his
[13:24 - 13:29]
father in law's entire sum of money was used up and
[13:29 - 13:34]
they started to dip in very heavily into his own reserves and the realisation of
[13:34 - 13:36]
what an illness may cost.
[13:36 - 13:41]
Basically my own philosophy on this is this.
[13:41 - 13:46]
This can be a great burden what I'm interested in the indigent somehow the state always
[13:46 - 13:51]
takes care of the people of great wealth are always taken care of. But you do have a
[13:51 - 13:56]
great body of people in America I think the overwhelming number of self-respecting
[13:56 - 14:00]
hardworking people who spend a lifetime. On a job
[14:00 - 14:05]
and during the during this lifetime they have bought a home and
[14:05 - 14:10]
paid off the mortgage and a house is worth ten or twelve thousand dollars they have two or three thousand dollars
[14:10 - 14:15]
in the bank and suddenly they are stricken with a very serious illness that places
[14:15 - 14:20]
one or both of them in the hospital for a long stay then they suddenly find that they have to
[14:20 - 14:25]
mortgage or sell their house and use up their savings. And there could be no greater tragedy
[14:25 - 14:30]
for a person who has worked hard who was overwhelmed with their own home who has been unable to save a
[14:30 - 14:35]
few dollars in the savings bank suddenly found it finding themselves destitute and
[14:35 - 14:40]
bereft in the waning years of their lives. I mean I think we are interested in people like
[14:40 - 14:45]
this and this represents the overwhelming number of Americans now their $10000
[14:45 - 14:50]
home with their $5000 in a bank might under statistics you would say they could afford to
[14:50 - 14:54]
pay for an illness. But if they were struck by a major illness with a large cost of
[14:54 - 14:59]
hospital care today then they wouldn't be able to take care of the illness.
[14:59 - 15:03]
I mean yes ma'am.
[15:03 - 15:15]
Yes well I would say this. I mean you asked this question yesterday and I think it as I showed
[15:15 - 15:20]
you then it's a legitimate question yesterday's legitimate question today. The bill
[15:20 - 15:24]
will contain provisions on the impacted areas
[15:24 - 15:30]
the amount and conditions of that particular phase of the program has
[15:30 - 15:35]
not been decided. As of this press conference just
[15:35 - 15:39]
to make it clear because of some of the questions I asked at the White House yesterday at the briefing
[15:39 - 15:44]
this 10 percent is not intended to be a substitute for
[15:44 - 15:49]
that. There will be a program and that program will be spelt out
[15:49 - 15:54]
in the bill that will be presented sometime this
[15:54 - 15:55]
week.
[15:55 - 16:00]
I think what Wednesday is a holiday and a few things have to be ironed out in the
[16:00 - 16:04]
bill and and some of the problems the conditions of the amount of what goes the impacted areas
[16:04 - 16:10]
are also problems that haven't been quite decided as of now.
[16:10 - 16:15]
Not long now I would say definitely won't go tomorrow.
[16:15 - 16:22]
Yes or.
[16:22 - 16:27]
Whatever you know. They think
[16:27 - 16:34]
oh.
[16:34 - 16:38]
I would say this I mean you people and anyone can say whatever they
[16:38 - 16:43]
want. The only thing that I have said that any basic decision I'd like to know
[16:43 - 16:48]
about it first before I read in the paper. That's the only state that's the only directive
[16:48 - 16:53]
and I think that is one of the things I learned as a governor I mean I hated to be called 3 o'clock in the
[16:53 - 16:58]
morning by a newspaper man asking me a question and I never heard of it. So they can
[16:58 - 17:05]
issue it but I'd like to know it before you fellows know it's OK to call me up I can give you an answer.
[17:05 - 17:09]
I and you are Snell and I
[17:09 - 17:11]
will and I cannot.
[17:11 - 17:16]
That I know of someone as Jack Bell asked me on Meet the Press about all these
[17:16 - 17:21]
new people I started to think of. Of all the people outside of presidential appointments
[17:21 - 17:26]
I brought in and out of 70000 of pool employees I think I could point to there were
[17:26 - 17:31]
four there was John Newman and Wally Turner and
[17:31 - 17:36]
Phil dam or a and Jamaican and now best Berman.
[17:36 - 17:41]
If you want to call these all political appointees This is the extent of my political appointees out
[17:41 - 17:45]
of 70000 people. But as you know they the people you deal with on a day to day
[17:45 - 17:50]
basis they are here and I would gather the overwhelming number of them
[17:50 - 17:55]
and then we'll be here. My feeling is at the very nature of this department is
[17:55 - 18:00]
such that it is beyond politics that
[18:00 - 18:05]
almost all of the over well the overwhelming number of jobs should be handled
[18:05 - 18:09]
under civil service procedures that have pertain for many years.
[18:09 - 18:14]
I have been I have been and I am impressed with the caliber and quality of the
[18:14 - 18:19]
career people in this department and I hope that we can continue to have a department of
[18:19 - 18:20]
the same caliber.
[18:20 - 18:32]
Well I mean I got the directive today sorry I will try to do it is as soon as I
[18:32 - 18:37]
can gather together thoughtfully at the people
[18:37 - 18:42]
in this field. I I happen to believe very deeply in vocational education.
[18:42 - 18:46]
I think that this is a most important phase of the educate overall education
[18:46 - 18:51]
problems of our nation. I believe that the time has come to update
[18:51 - 18:56]
vocational education in America. I am very anxious to get on with the job and I
[18:56 - 19:01]
hope to be able to get this group together as soon as possible following the directive of
[19:01 - 19:04]
the president very
[19:04 - 19:14]
much the right amount of the help that will be provided. There is
[19:14 - 19:19]
nothing you know that you didn't like the other prisons
[19:19 - 19:23]
overseas but in general that you find a great
[19:23 - 19:28]
pleasure I think that the administration bill
[19:28 - 19:33]
has been very carefully and thoughtfully worked out both
[19:33 - 19:39]
for benefits to be received and fiscal
[19:39 - 19:44]
and actuarial a responsibility and I do believe that the bill
[19:44 - 19:48]
that we brought together is a proper bill taking into account
[19:48 - 19:54]
the actuarial projection and what you can buy for one half
[19:54 - 19:59]
send Social Security tax and I would and it would be my recommendation that we stick with
[19:59 - 20:00]
that.
[20:00 - 20:05]
RICK PERRY Yes. Oh boy
[20:05 - 20:12]
all right. You're there could be situations where federal funds be
[20:12 - 20:17]
withheld from the schools but I think you can see there's a
[20:17 - 20:18]
situation here.
[20:18 - 20:23]
If I don't I don't know of any right that I have or
[20:23 - 20:28]
power that the secretary has at the present time.
[20:28 - 20:33]
I do know this that when a man takes an executive position
[20:33 - 20:38]
he is really two people I mean there are his own ideas and his own
[20:38 - 20:43]
philosophy and there is also the duty that he has to carry out the Constitution of the
[20:43 - 20:48]
laws of the United States of America. And when Congress
[20:48 - 20:53]
passes a law that says you do this you do it whether you believe the law is sound or is
[20:53 - 20:54]
unsound.
[20:54 - 20:59]
Now I know of nothing in the law at the present
[20:59 - 21:03]
time that would allow the secretary to deny Fons
[21:03 - 21:09]
to any school district to any public school district in the United States.
[21:09 - 21:14]
I don't I don't know that the president can do this this
[21:14 - 21:19]
I don't know either whether there's any law that allows a president to do this. I can't
[21:19 - 21:24]
speak for the president but I don't know
[21:24 - 21:27]
that whether there's anything that I can do a secretary.
[21:27 - 21:36]
That he has you know the president hasn't asked me about this. I
[21:36 - 21:40]
have asked for all the information that is available on all these
[21:40 - 21:44]
questions I'm just interested in it personally.
[21:44 - 21:47]
I am curious about it and interested in it.
[21:47 - 21:52]
But I know of no general program in
[21:52 - 21:56]
existence at the present time I think in the any any
[21:56 - 22:01]
DNA there is a provision that no
[22:01 - 22:05]
loans would be denied to any student because of race color creed or religion.
[22:05 - 22:10]
I think in this message that we have that the president sent out sent up today
[22:10 - 22:16]
concerning scholarships. There was a statement in there that nobody would be. No one should be
[22:16 - 22:19]
denied a scholarship because of race color creed or religion.
[22:19 - 22:22]
So there you have it spelled out.
[22:22 - 22:26]
But outside of having it spelled out I don't know of any
[22:26 - 22:31]
specific and he specific place where this can be done now. Again I don't
[22:31 - 22:36]
know of all the details and all the laws if there are any specific ones that you know about that
[22:36 - 22:40]
I don't know about I would be I would welcome to be informed of this.
[22:40 - 22:57]
Well I would say under the president's program we as I would say and I would say
[22:57 - 23:02]
under the president's program this would be a private school and not a public school it wouldn't be
[23:02 - 23:07]
counted in the grant the grant is for average daily attendance to public schools.
[23:07 - 23:10]
What you were talking about would be a private school serve
[23:10 - 23:17]
problem with Kelly Price will probably be easy
[23:17 - 23:23]
but I would say I think very well. Hello sir. And I
[23:23 - 23:29]
let her run for president. Yeah.
[23:29 - 23:35]
I well my feeling is that the secretary Fleming was correct in that decision.
[23:35 - 23:36]
Yes sir.
[23:36 - 23:36]
Good
[23:36 - 23:45]
evening. You
[23:45 - 23:51]
mean you're all changing. You know
[23:51 - 23:59]
me pretty mayor and.
[23:59 - 24:04]
I would say that what Mr. Mills introduced represents my position and the
[24:04 - 24:06]
administration's position now.
[24:06 - 24:12]
Yes. That's right.
[24:12 - 24:17]
I would say with that the situation with the recession and the number of people out of work I
[24:17 - 24:23]
would say that the position taken on that bill is sound as of today.
[24:23 - 24:27]
Yesterday the president has proposed that he will
[24:27 - 24:32]
run at any price to be relieved of the
[24:32 - 24:34]
sentence without the book.
[24:34 - 24:49]
Not at all I mean since the ADA is specifically designed to help in
[24:49 - 24:54]
the construction public schools and the payment of teachers
[24:54 - 24:59]
salaries in public schools then this is the test that you go by and there was no
[24:59 - 25:04]
justification for counting in the students who go to a private or parochial
[25:04 - 25:09]
schools. If you are only going to try to solve the problem of
[25:09 - 25:13]
construction and teachers in public schools I think that it's very
[25:13 - 25:17]
logical to have this formula in view of the president's objective.
[25:17 - 25:33]
I personally believe. That Howard
[25:33 - 25:38]
University should pay should play an increasingly
[25:38 - 25:43]
large role in the educational process of this country. I
[25:43 - 25:47]
have recommended that there be a substantial increase in the
[25:47 - 25:52]
allocation of funds to Howard University over that provided in the Eisenhower
[25:52 - 25:56]
budget and it would be my hope and
[25:56 - 26:01]
interest as secretary to do everything that I
[26:01 - 26:07]
can to make Howard University a stronger and greater University.
[26:07 - 26:11]
You know they say that they
[26:11 - 26:16]
think that is the right.
[26:16 - 26:23]
Well I have been saying this but let me say this.
[26:23 - 26:28]
The field of mental health was one was a field that I was vitally and
[26:28 - 26:33]
deeply interested in as governor in Connecticut. I believe that mental
[26:33 - 26:38]
mental illness is one of the greatest scar GEs and one of
[26:38 - 26:43]
the most important diseases to overcome with one out of every 10
[26:43 - 26:48]
Americans being stricken during their lifetime with mental illness. There was a great
[26:48 - 26:52]
opportunity Faraz on the federal level to make
[26:52 - 26:57]
site Elizabeth's Hospital one of the most meaningful and forward looking hospitals in the
[26:57 - 27:02]
country. And I would certainly do everything possible as secretary to
[27:02 - 27:07]
encourage the future growth and advancement of St. Elizabeth's.
[27:07 - 27:12]
And again as you can well realize my time has been taken up
[27:12 - 27:17]
very very fully with the problems of the president's program to
[27:17 - 27:22]
date. And I have not had an opportunity to go into details
[27:22 - 27:24]
on site Elizabeth. Yes ma'am.
[27:24 - 27:40]
I don't that well I don't know where we can if they have a pipe. If a pub if it
[27:40 - 27:45]
isn't a public school it's a private school then I don't see where they're entitled to any federal
[27:45 - 27:50]
support. I don't
[27:50 - 27:56]
know what I could do this would I would say this would assist said this was something you have to be decided by the court.
[27:56 - 28:02]
I don't know anything the secretary can do.
[28:02 - 28:08]
Yes that is very very well.
[28:08 - 28:12]
You are right
[28:12 - 28:17]
here this is exactly the wrong
[28:17 - 28:23]
thing. This will be
[28:23 - 28:26]
your legacy.
[28:26 - 28:31]
Right or
[28:31 - 28:41]
I would say is a matter of fact it would give impetus to just
[28:41 - 28:46]
what you are talking about for this reason. The greatest burden upon
[28:46 - 28:52]
the private insurance companies are Blue Cross in the health field are the people over the age
[28:52 - 28:56]
65. And yet people under the age 60 under age
[28:56 - 29:01]
65 still suffer from illness and hospitalization.
[29:01 - 29:06]
If Blue Cross and the private insurance companies do not have the costly burden
[29:06 - 29:11]
actuarially the high cost over 65 I think that they
[29:11 - 29:15]
could write much lower rates on their policies in the
[29:15 - 29:20]
lower age brackets and it would be my guess that if
[29:20 - 29:25]
anything this would encourage insurance in the
[29:25 - 29:27]
same fields.
[29:27 - 29:32]
I from Washington D.C. This has been a press conference with United States secretary of Health
[29:32 - 29:37]
Education and Welfare. Abraham Ribicoff it was recorded in February in
[29:37 - 29:41]
cooperation with the United States Information Agency and prepared by the Washington office of the
[29:41 - 29:46]
National Association of educational broadcasters program arranger was Leonard
[29:46 - 29:51]
press production by the University of Michigan Broadcasting Service. This is
[29:51 - 29:55]
the n AB Radio Network A.
🔍