Reading Group on Cultural Studies and Feminist Theory Stanford University, Winter 1990 Initiators: Antje Wiener (Department of Political Science) Heather Zwicker (Department of English) Sponsor: Regenia Gagnier (Department of English) Purpose This reading group provides introductory readings to a critical discussion of feminist theory. It looks at feminist theory in an interdisciplinary way. We begin by questioning the notion of feminist theory and methodology, and then look at its particular manifestations in the discourses of history and political science, paying attention to the complexities of race and class as well as gender. From there we will look at some of the more radical critiques mounted from within the discourse, examining arguments that chart some ways feminist theory might adapt itself to the challenges posed by postmodernism and poststructuralism. Participants From: School of Education, Departments of English, German, Latin American Studies, Political Science, Sociology Syllabus WEEK ONE: Feminist Theory and Feminist Method Harding, Sandra (1986), The Instability of the Analytical Categories of Feminist Theory, Signs 11, 4, pp. 645 - 664. ------ (1987), Introduction: Is There a Feminist Method?, in Harding, Sandra, Feminism and Methodology. Bloomington: Indiana UP. WEEK TWO: The Historical Approach, an Overview Editorial (1989), Why Gender and History?, Gender and History 1, 1, pp. 1 - 6. Bock, Gisela (1989), Women's History and Gender History: Aspects of an International Debate, Gender and History 1, 1, pp. 7 - 30. WEEK THREE: Gender as a Category for Historical Research (I) Scott, Joan W. (1988), Gender a Useful Category of Historical Analysis, in Scott, J. W., Gender and the Politics of History. New York: Columbia UP, pp. 28 - 50. ------ (1988), On Language, Gender and Working Class History, in Scott, J. W., op. cit., pp. 53 - 67. ------ (1988), Women in the Making of the English Working Class, in Scott, J. W., op. cit., pp. 68 - 90. WEEK FOUR: Gender as a Category for Historical Research (II) Nicholson, Linda J. (1986), Toward a Method of Understanding Gender, in Nicholson, L. J., Gender and History: The Limits of Social Theory in the Age of the Family. New York: Columbia UP, pp. 69 - 104. ------ (1986), Gender and Maternity: Reinterpreting the Family, the State, and the Economy, in Nicholson, L. J., op. cit., pp. 105 - 132. ------ (1986), Conclusion, in Nicholson, L. J., op. cit., pp. 201 - 208. WEEK FIVE: Gender as a Category for Historical Research (III) Brooks-Higginbotham, Evelyn (1989), The Problem of Race in Women's History, in Weed, Elizabeth (ed.), Coming to Terms. New York/London: Routledge, pp. 122 - 133. Riley, Denise (1989), Commentary: Feminism and the Consolidations of "Women" in History, in Weed, E., op. cit., pp. 134 - 139. WEEK SIX: Gender as an Analytic Category in Political Science Jones, Kathleen B. and Anna G. Jonasdottir (eds.) (1988), Introduction: Gender as an Analytica Category in Political Theory, in Jones, K. B. and A. G. Jonasdottir, The Political Interests of Gender: Developing Theory with a Feminist Face. London et al.: Sage, pp. 1 - 10. Pateman, Carole (1989), Feminist Critiques of the Public/Private Dichotomy, in Pateman, C., The Disorder of Women. Stanford: Stanford UP, pp. 118 - 140. WEEK SEVEN: Gender as an Analytic Category in Political Science (II) Pateman, Carole (1989), Feminism and Democracy, in Pateman, C., op. cit., pp. 210 - 223. Okin, Susan M. (1990), Thinking like a Woman, in Rhode, Deborah L. (ed.) Theoretical Perspectives on Sexual Difference. New Haven/London: Yale UP, pp. 145 - 159. WEEK EIGHT: Gender and Beyond Tiano, Susan (1987), Gender, Work and World Capitalism: Third World Women's Role in Development, in Hess, Beth B. and Myra Marx Ferree (eds.), Analyzing Gender: A Handbook of Social Science Research. London et al.: Sage, pp. 216 - 243. Yanagisako, Sylvia J. and Jane F. Collier (1990), The Mode of Reproduction in Anthropology, in Rhode, D. (ed.), op. cit., pp. 131 - 144. Malveaux, Julianne (1990), Gender Difference and Beyond: An Economic Perspective on Diversity and Commonality Among Women, in Rhode, D. (ed.), op. cit., pp. 226 - 238. WEEK NINE: Feminist Theory, Another "Traditional" Approach? Haraway, Donna (1989), A Manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, Technology and Socialist Feminism in the 1980s, in Weed, E. (ed.), op. cit., pp. 173 - 204. Crosby, Cristina (1989), Commentary: Allies and Enemies, in Weed, E., op. cit., pp. 205 - 208. Doane, Mary A. (1989), Commentary: Cyborgs, Origins, and Subjectivity, in Weed, E., op. cit., pp. 209 - 214. Scott, Joan W. (1989), Commentary: Cyborgian Socialists? in Weed. E., op. cit., pp. 215 - 217. WEEK TEN: Is There a Change in Feminist Theory? Alcoff, Linda (1988), Cultural Feminism versus Post-Structuralism: The Identity Crisis in Feminist Theory, Signs 13, 3, pp. 405 - 436. Gagnier, Regenia (1990), Feminist Postmodernism: The End of Feminism or the Ends of Theory?, in Rhode, D. (ed.), op. cit., pp. 21 - 30. Fryre, Marilyn (1990), The Possibility of Feminist Theory, in Rhode, D. (ed.), op. cit., pp. 174 - 184. Syllabus contributed by Antje Wiener (AWIENER@CCS.CARLETON.CA)